Outcome of tympanoplasty using the interlay technique: A longitudinal study
Abstract
The research evaluates how well the interlay procedure functions in type 1 tympanoplasty operations for big central perforations along with studies of both graft uptake rates and auditory outcomes and treatment-related issues.
The study analyzed between 2022 and 2024 patient with chronic otitis media in 60 subjects with dry central perforations between ages 15 and 55, Active otitis media and sensorineural hearing loss cases were not included in the trial. Outcomes were measured through otomicroscopy in combination with pure-tone audiometry using SPSS v20.0,
A 96% successful graft uptake rate was achieved through operatively reducing air-bone gaps from 19.2 to 6.8 dB while complications affected only 1% of patients (P < 0.01).
Healthcare professionals choose the interlay technique because it shows reliable outcomes and safety measures to handle large central perforations effectively.
Downloads
References
● [2] Masaomi Motegi, Masahiro Takahashi, Hiromi Kojima, Yutaka Yamamoto, Kazuhisa Yamamoto. (2022). Endoscopic tympanoplasty type I using interlay technique. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9670569/
● [3] View of Interlay myringoplasty: hearing gain and outcomein large central tympanic membrane perforation | Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. (2024). https://opthalmology.medresearch.in/index.php/jooo/article/view/20/32
● [4] Subir Gupta, Binoy Krishna Biswas, Manjurul Karim Khan. (2023). Type 1 Tympanoplasty by Interlay Technique for Management of Tympanic Membrane Perforation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368658340_Type_1_Tympanoplasty_by_Interlay_Technique_for_Management_of_Tympanic_Membrane_Perforation
● [5] Mithram Z. Wadia, Ajay J. Panchal, Manit M. Mandal, Vipul V. Valiya, Rakesh Kumar. (2022). A Study of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895200/
● [6] A Study of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation. (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36742876/
● [7] abc. (2018). medip,+IJOHNS-1187+O. https://www.ijorl.com/index.php/ijorl/article/download/1187/667/5299
● [8] Kumar Gaurav Sharma, V. P. Goyal, Nitin Sharma, Pritosh Sharma. (2019). Interlay versus underlay type 1 tympanoplasty: a comparative study of the techniques in 100 cases. https://www.ijorl.com/index.php/ijorl/article/view/1187
● [9] P. R. Misale, B. C. Patil, R. S. Mane, A. A. Mohite. (2014). Outcome of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4571467/
● [10] Endoscopic tympanoplasty type I using interlay technique. (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36397175/
● [11] Interlay Cartilage Rim Augmented Fascia Tympanoplasty: An Effective Graft Model in Mucosal Chronic Otitis Media. (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35070923/
● [12] abc;p. (2020). medip,+IJOHNS-2724+O. https://www.ijorl.com/index.php/ijorl/article/download/2724/1545/11751
● [13] Satveer Singh Jassal, Manish Chandra. (2019). Longitudinal Study of Type I Interlay Tympanoplasty. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6841855/
● [14] B. Sphoorthi, B. T. Subramanya, S. Lohith. (2019). Endoscopic myringoplasty: outcome and hearing gain in inactive mucosal chronic otitis media. https://www.ijorl.com/index.php/ijorl/article/view/1259
● [15] Aditiya Saraf, Padam Singh Jamwal, Monica Manhas, Raies Ahmad Begh, Parmod Kalsotra. (2022). Comparative Study of Overlay and Underlay Techniques of Myringoplasty-Our Experience. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9411416/
● [16] Zhang. Yanting, Lou. Zhengcai. (2023). Inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap approach for the repair of large marginal perforations. https://bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12893-023-02286-y
● [17] Yanting Zhang, Zhengcai Lou. (2023). Inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap approach for the repair of large marginal perforations. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10717025/
● [18] Daneshi. Ahmad, Mohseni. Mohammad, Nasoori. Yasser, Balali. Maryam, Rostami. Sara, Asghari. Alimohamad. (2018). Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bucket Handle and Cartilage Tympanoplasty Techniques for the Reconstruction of Subtotal or Anterior Tympanic Membrane Perforation. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijoto/2018/2431023/
● [19] Dipesh Shakya. Ajit Nepal. (2020). Total Endoscopic Perichondrium Reinforced Cartilage Myringoplasty for Anterior Perforation. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0145561320946908
● [20] TOSHIBA. (2019). Original Article. https://zumj.journals.ekb.eg/article_37910_da41d182bf71579d15489b3a8773c3ef.pdf
● [21] Ajay J. Panchal, Manit M. Mandal, Rakesh Kumar, Parth B. Kapadia. (2022). Outcomes of Tympanoplasty Performed in Dry and Wet Ear Groups: A Comprehensive Comparative Study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9895573/
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the GPH Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
