THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE WORK DISCIPLINE AT THE EDUCATION OFFICE OF SAMARINDA CITY

  • Maskan, AF Lecturer in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of 17 August 1945 Samarinda
  • Ahmad Jubaidi Lecturer in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of 17 August 1945 Samarinda
  • . Jamiah Lecturer in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of 17 August 1945 Samarinda
  • . Fitriyani Student in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of 17 August 1945 Samarinda
Keywords: Leadership, Work Discipline

Abstract

The aim of the study was to find out how the influence of leadership on employee work discipline at the Office of the Education Personnel Office in Samarinda City.

The research was conducted at the Office of the Education and Culture Office of Samarinda City. This research used a correlational method and a quantitative approach.

In this study, the population was the City of Samarinda Education and Culture Office employees, totaling 66 people and the sample in this study was 40 people. There are 2 ways to collect data, namely: (1) field studies through observation, interviews and questionnaires/questions. and (2) literature study.

Data analysis was carried out, namely: (1) test the validity of the research instrument; (2) test the reliability of the research instrument, (3) simple linear regression analysis, then to test the truth of the research hypothesis using the t test, (4) the correlation coefficient and (5) the coefficient of determination. All data processing uses the Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) 25.0 software program.

The results of the study show that: (1) there is a positive influence between leadership variables on work discipline variables; and the value of the Coefficient of Determination (R2) = 0.423, which means that the influence of the leadership variable on the work discipline variable is 42.30%. (2) The coefficient value of the leadership variable is 0.499 which means that if the leadership variable (X) is increased by 1 unit, the employee's work discipline will increase by 0.499; and (3) the coefficient of the leadership variable is positive, which means that the better the existing leadership, the employee work discipline will increase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berman, S. O., Andika, C. B., &Prasetya, A. B. (2020). A Literature Review: Does Transformational Leadership impact and Effective in the Public Bureaucratic. International Journal of Sociology, Policy and Law (IJOSPL), 01(01), 44–50. http://www.ijospl.org
Bugdol, M. (2018).A Different Approach to Work Discipline: Models, Manifestations and Methods of Behaviour Modification. Switzerland: AG part of Springer Nature.
Dharma, A. 2001.Supervision Management. Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta.
Ghozali, I. 2009. Mutivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 19 Program. BP Undip, Semarang.
Hasibuan, S. M., andBahri, S. 2018. The Influence of Leadership, Work Environment and Work Motivation on Performance.Maneggio: Scientific Journal of Master of Management, 1(1), 71–80.
Kalliola, S., &Mahlakaarto, S. (2020).Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work.Challenges, 11(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe11020030
Kartono. 2005. Leaders and Leadership. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Loan, L. T. M. (2020). The Influence of Organizational Commitment on Employees’ Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3307–3312. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.007
Manley, K., &Titchen, A. (2017).Manley, K., &Titchen, A. (2017). Facilitation Skills: The Catalyst For Increased Effectiveness in Consultant Practice and Clinical Systems Leadership. Educational Action Research, 25(2), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1158118
Martoyo, S. 2007. Human Resource Management. BPEE, Yogyakarta.
Mendfora, S.A.; Syahyarand B.K. Fawzeea. 20210. The Influence of Leadership, Supervision and Job Satisfaction on Employee Work Discipline. Alignment Journal 4 (2) : 130 – 140
Mulyani, S. R., Sari, V. N., & Sari, M. W. (2019).The Model of Employee Motivation and Cooperative Employee Performance.Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.32
Nasution, L. and R.N. Ichsan. 2021. The Effect of Leadership Implementation on Employee Performance at the Karo District Education Office. Metadata Scientific Journal 3 (1) : 308 – 321.
Rahmi, A., Achmad, G. N., &Adhimursandi, D. (2020).The Effect of Leadership and Empowerment Style and Motivation on Work Discipline and Employee 2021.ALIGNMENT:Journal of Administration and Educational Management 4(2):130-140
Siagian, S. P. 2014. Human Resource Management.BumiAksara, Jakarta.
Stinglhamber, F., Caesens, G., Chalmagne, B., Demoulin, S., &Maurage, P. (2021). Leader–Member Exchange and Organizational Dehumanization: The Role of Supervisor’s Organizational Embodiment. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.006
Soejono, S. 2005. Sociology An Introduction. Raja GrapindoPersada, Jakarta.
Suhudi, N. E., Sunaryo, H., &Priyono, A. A. (2018).The Influence of Work Motivation, Leadership and Organizational Culture on Employee Performance (Office of Babulu District, North PenajamPaser Regency, East Kalimantan). Scientific Journal of Management Research, 7(02), 71-80. http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jrm/article/view/1042/1071
Sutrisno, E. 2009.Human Resource Management First edition.KencanaPrenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Arikunto, S. 2005. ManjemenPenelitianEdisiRevisi. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Arikunto, S. 2010. ProsedurPenelitianSuatuPendekatanPraktek. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Azwar, Saifuddin. 2010. MetodePenelitian. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
Danim, Sudarma, Prof.Dr.2004. MotivasiKepemimpinandanEfektifitasKelompok,Jakarta: PT. RinekaCipta
Hadar, Nawawi. 2005. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2005. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia, EdisiRevisi. Bumi Jakarta: Aksara.
HeidjrachmandanSuadHusnan. 1994. ManajemenPersonalia, Yogyakarta : Haji Mas Agung.
Kartono. 2005. PemimpindanKepemimpinan. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Mahmud. 2011. MetodePenelitianPendidikan. Bandung: PustakaSetia
Mangkunegara, Prabu Anwar. 2005. ManajemenSumberDayaManusia Perusahaan. RemajaRosdakarya. Bandung.
Mardiatmadja, B.S. 1988. Disiplin, Jakarta :Kompas
Mulyana, Dedy. 2004. MetodologiPenelitianKualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja.
Nitisemito, Alex. S. 1983. ManjamenPersonalia, Jakarta :Ghalia Indonesia.
Rivai, Veithzal, Prof.Dr.M.B.A, 2007. KepemimpinandanPrilakuOrganisasi, Jakarta: PT. Raja Gravindo.
Sugiyono. 2015. MetodePenelitianKombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2011. MetodePenelitianKuantitatif, Kualitatifdan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta
Sugiyono. 2015. MetodePenelitianKombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta
SumberUndang-Undang
Undang-UndangNomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentangDisiplinKerjaPegawaiNegeriSipil
Undang-UndangNomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentangAparaturSipil Negara
Published
2022-12-22
How to Cite
AF, M., Jubaidi, A., Jamiah, ., & Fitriyani, . (2022). THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE WORK DISCIPLINE AT THE EDUCATION OFFICE OF SAMARINDA CITY. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 5(12), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7474022